Trump Declares Himself 'King' on X, Truth Social

Distance Between Perspectives: The divide is significant, with the Left warning of creeping authoritarianism and the Right dismissing concerns as politically motivated overreactions.

February 20, 2025

The Basics:
President Donald Trump yesterday sparked widespread debate by referring to himself as a "king" following his decision to rescind New York City's congestion pricing program. Trump posted on Truth Social: "CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!" The official White House social media accounts amplified this message, sharing an image of Trump wearing a crown.

🔵 The Left’s Perspective:
Left-leaning sources say that Trump’s self-anointment as “king” signals a dangerous disregard for democratic norms. They say that embracing monarchical imagery undermines the values of the U.S. Constitution, which was explicitly designed to prevent centralized, unchecked power.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul responded, stating: “The United States is a democracy, not a monarchy.” Other Democratic leaders expressed concerns that Trump’s rhetoric could further erode public trust in democratic institutions, especially as he continues to consolidate executive power.

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker in a State of the State address said, “We don’t have kings in America - and I don’t intend to bend the knee to one.”

Other left-leaning analysts and news publications point out that the Founding Fathers fought to create a republic free from king-like rule, and framing a president as a monarch—even in jest—sets a dangerous precedent.

🔴 The Right’s Perspective:
Right-leaning sources dismiss the backlash as an overreaction, arguing that Trump’s "king" reference was nothing more than playful rhetoric. They say Democrats and the media are taking his words too literally, using them to stoke unnecessary fears about authoritarianism.

Many conservatives view the crown imagery as part of Trump’s signature bravado, comparing it to past political leaders using strong, symbolic language to project confidence and strength. Some argue that the real issue isn’t Trump’s words but rather the media’s obsession with interpreting everything he says as a threat to democracy.

Others note that political figures have embraced royal language in the past without controversy, accusing critics of hypocrisy. They argue that the outrage is politically motivated, rather than rooted in genuine concern for democratic principles.

⚖️ The Middle Ground:
Trump’s "king" remark has reignited a long-standing debate over the power of presidential rhetoric and its influence on American democracy. While some argue that symbolic language should not be taken literally, others believe that leaders must be mindful of how their words shape public perception and political culture.

The question is where the line should be drawn between playful rhetoric and speech that weakens democracy. If language matters in shaping political discourse, presidents should be more cautious about the way they frame their authority, while others argue that the outrage is overblown in a political landscape where leaders often use exaggerated language to energize their base.

Regardless of intent, Trump’s "king" persona has led to important discussion about the role of presidential leadership, the impact of language in democracy, and the expectations placed on elected officials.

Language Differences:

Right's Perspective: “playful rhetoric,” “symbolic language,” “media overreaction”

Left's Perspective: “authoritarian overreach,” “disregard for democratic norms,” “dangerous precedent”

Reply

or to participate.